No vendor sponsorships. No affiliate links on tool pages. Pricing re-verified monthly.
[lab]besttestautomationtool.com

Compare brief · Legacy modernisation decision

Cypress vs Selenium

Cypress vs Selenium is the legacy-modernisation decision for teams that are not (yet) ready to move all the way to Playwright.

Direct answer

Our take: in 2026 this is usually the wrong frame. The better question is Playwright vs Selenium, with Cypress as a niche pick when its UX trade-offs are wanted.

open-source

Cypress

composite: 72 · pricing: public

Price card re-read 22 Sep 2026. The published tiers are Starter (free, 500 test results/month, 10 users), Team, Business and Enterprise. There is no paid Starter tier. Team is $67/month billed annually at $799/year, or $75/month month-to-month, and includes 120k test results/year. Business is $267/month billed annually at $3,199/year, or $300/month month-to-month, with the same 120k/year allowance. Enterprise is quote-only and includes 1.8M test results/year. Adoption remains flat at around 14% in 2026 surveys on 6.5M weekly npm downloads.

Open the Cypress brief →

open-source

Selenium

composite: 64 · pricing: public

Selenium 4.x stable; Selenium Manager handles driver provisioning automatically; adoption share continues to slip vs Playwright in 2026 dev surveys.

Open the Selenium brief →

Pick A when

Pick Cypress when

Small SPA-first team that values author ergonomics over architectural breadth.

Pick B when

Pick Selenium when

Polyglot estate that needs WebDriver-protocol guarantees.

Cost

How the cost picture differs

Cypress carries a Cloud subscription if you want hosted runs; Selenium is free at licence but heavier on engineer time.

Open the 3-year TCO calculator →

Caveats

Things this compare cannot answer

  • Neither is the right answer for native desktop or many enterprise packaged apps.
  • If your only reason to pick Cypress over Selenium is friendlier authoring, consider Playwright first.